APMA has the resources you need to help you through every step of your career. With detailed information about MIPS and recent coding trends along with compliance guidelines and practice marketing materials, APMA has you covered whether you are just getting started in practice, preparing for retirement, or anywhere in between.
Today's podiatrist has the necessary education and training to treat all conditions of the foot and ankle and plays a key role in keeping America healthy and mobile while helping combat diabetes and other chronic diseases.
Your feet are excellent barometers for your overall health. Healthy feet keep you moving and active. They are quite literally your foundation. In this section, learn more about APMA Seal-approved and accepted products, proper foot care, common foot and ankle conditions, and how your podiatrist can help keep you and your feet healthy.
APMA is the only organization lobbying for podiatrists and their patients on Capitol Hill. As the voice of podiatric medicine to your legislators and regulators, APMA is active on a variety of critical issues affecting podiatry and the entire health-care system.
On August 30, APMA met with members of its Contractor Advisory Committee (CAC) Engagement Coalition to discuss updates from the Coalition’s July meeting with representatives from CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Medical Directors discussing the coalition’s recommendations to CMS and the MACs related to local coverage policy development. As part of the August meeting, the coalition discussed opportunities to broaden the coalition (including an updated white paper on the issues), narrowing the principles for policy development outlined in the group’s advocacy approach, and considerations for approaching CMS for further advocacy (including a proposed draft letter).
Previously, in July, APMA and members of the coalition met with representatives from CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Medical Directors. This meeting was designed to provide details on discussions between the MACs and CMS stemming from APMA and the coalition’s previous feedback on proposed improvements in the policy development process and CAC representative access. While the representatives from the MACs and CMS were not open to all of the suggestions from APMA and the coalition, APMA did make plans to continue working with the MAC CMD workgroup to address process improvement in multi-jurisdictional CAC subject matter expert selection and in review of developing policies.
In March, APMA submitted to the MAC workgroup its Principles of Sound Local Coverage Policies and consensus answers to questions raised by CMS and the workgroup. APMA has been working with its CAC Engagement Coalition to reach these consensus positions.
Previously, on February 7, APMA met with the members of the CAC Engagement Coalition to review these materials and discuss consensus answers to questions raised by CMS and the MAC Workgroup, which is investigating changes to the CAC feedback process brought about by 21st Century Cures Act. APMA plans to revise the group’s materials and share this information with the MAC Workgroup and with CMS to help improve the process for developing LCDs and LCAs and contribute to more reasonable policies and better beneficiary care.
On January 9, APMA had previously gathered the CAC Engagement Coalition to gain consensus and set strategy for its upcoming meeting with the MAC Workgroup. As part of this meeting, APMA shared questions that had been posed by the MAC workgroup as well as a draft document that APMA has created based on feedback by the coalition and stakeholders on Principles of Sound Local Coverage Policies. APMA’s involvement with the MAC Workgroup came about through APMA’s leadership in the CAC process and LCD development as well as the strong working relationships between APMA’s CAC representatives and their contractor medical directors (CMDs).
Previously, on September 30, 2022, APMA and its CAC engagement coalition held a call with CMS in furtherance of their CAC engagement efforts to address cross-agency issues with CMS.
APMA and the coalition have experienced several challenges with the Local Coverage (LC) process in recent years and have brought those concerns to CMS’ Coverage and Analysis Group (CAG). The CAG has considered APMA’s concerns and is working to address many of them on an ongoing basis.
As previously reported in APMA Weekly Focus, the CAG has raised many of our concerns regarding CACs with the MAC medical directors, who have developed a working group to address concerns raised by this group, and with whom we are engaged to continue to work through several issues. However, other issues have hit roadblocks, so APMA requested this meeting with CMS to facilitate cross-agency engagement on these issues to help advance goals of transparency, burden reduction, and sound policy.
Specifically, APMA and the coalition again raised the following issues:
Lack of notice and comment regarding articles that determine coverage
Proper nomenclature and placement issues for “Articles” across CMS that do not address coverage
Performance metrics and additional accountability for MACs , including adhering to LCD timelines, new standards for CAC engagement, requirement to always include a draft LCA with the draft LCD for notice and comment
Need for an ombudsman to coordinate these issues
This meeting continues the efforts of APMA and the coalition to address lingering concerns regarding the Local Coverage Determination (LCDs) and Article (LCAs) review process, role of the CAC representatives, and other issues that APMA and our coalition have raised related to changes brought about by the 21st Century Cures Act.
Search
Login
Contact Us 
